T&A In Comics: A Rant January 22, 2012Posted by Skippy in Comics, Rants, Sexuality.
Tags: foolishness, geekery, nerdalicious
add a comment
Children, look at this image of X-person Psylocke:
Fig. 1: Chiropractors in the comic book world must be insanely rich.
Jesus H. Tebowing Christ from Vulcan. This is an image taken from Generation Hope #15. The woman with her tits and ass in such an absurd, spine-breaking position is supposedly X-person Psylocke. THIS is why we need more women artists and writers. I guarantee that you’d NEVER see Wolverine or Cyclops drawn wearing butt-floss and arching their posteriors like that. You’d NEVER see Spider-Man drawn thrusting his throbbing package in your face (well, you won’t see that in the mainstream comics–I can’t speak for what you’ll find in the form of fan art)*.
*warning: link is NSFW
As others have pointed out, if mainstream comics drew male superheroes the way female superheroes are drawn, fans (largely fanboys) would lose their shit. CNN would likely do at least one report on the sexualization of comic book heroes. Ever noticed how Batman, Superman, Thor, Spider-Man, etc., etc., are always fully-clothed? Ever noticed how most male superhero costumes are functional in some way? Granted, they are designed to be skin-tight and accentuate the exaggerated musculature, but never will you ever see an exaggeration of their crotch. Never. You will also never see a male superhero designed so that he is bare-chested, unless he’s Tarzan or Conan.
Folks, male comic book artists need to come into the 20th century and get it right. Even more so, the major companies (Marvel and DC) need to get it right. It might have been cute at one point to draw women that way, but holy mother of Spock, come on.
This Is What They Mean By “Engaged Learning”? March 3, 2011Posted by Skippy in Sexuality.
Tags: things that make you go 'hmm'
add a comment
Northwestern students and administrators are defending an explicit after-class demonstration involving a woman being publicly penetrated by a sex toy on stage in the popular Human Sexuality course last week.
The optional presentation last Monday, attended by about 120 students, featured a naked non-student woman being repeatedly sexually stimulated to the point of orgasm by the sex toy, referred to as a “fucksaw.” The device is essentially a motorized phallus.
The 600-person course, taught by psychology Prof. John Michael Bailey, is one of the largest at NU. The after-class events, which range from a question-and-answer session with swingers to a panel of convicted sex offenders, are a popular feature of the class. But they’re optional and none of the material is included on exams.
My initial reaction was “Ok, I’m all for teaching in ways that challenge students, but really?” As I thought about it, my initial “WTF?” reaction was prudish. Would I teach a class on human sexuality in that manner? Definitely not–however, it’s nigh unto impossible to teach a class dealing with human sexuality that wouldn’t in some way include material, discussions, or (in this case) demonstrations that would be considered offensive. When I have taught “Religion and Sexuality,” I’ve had students who got offended by the mere question “How do you know you’re heterosexual”—and that’s the first lecture on the first day. I’m pretty sure those students would not last the hour in Dr. Bailey’s class.
I daresay no one will ever forget this guy’s class!